Cyware vs Swimlane (Turbine)
Cyware is a low-code automation product, Orchestrate, sold beside a threat intelligence platform. Swimlane is an automation platform, Turbine, that routes alerts to playbooks or AI agents. They split on integration depth, where the rubric reads Cyware as documented and Swimlane as partial on the pages read on 2026-11-03. Check that difference first, then the buyer verdicts below.
0.27points apart
The difference that decides it
On integration depth, Cyware states 400+ tool integrations and names categories rather than products, while Swimlane shows 24 vendor tiles and an ever-expanding list of connectors with no count. cyware.com, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Cyware | Swimlane (Turbine) | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (17 and 18 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.1 | 7.4 | -0.3 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 5.0 | -1.0 |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 5.0 | +1.5 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 6.0 | 6.0 | level |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.0 | 5.5 | +2.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 7.0 | -0.5 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | level |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100 | 6.11 | 5.84 | 0.27 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Cyware and Swimlane (Turbine).
6.5 : 5.0approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Cyware. Page states approvals through a mobile app for "critical automation decisions" and rollback of workflows to previous versions; action rollback and scope limits are not stated. cyware.com, read
Swimlane (Turbine). Only "complex cases escalate to human-in-the-loop review" is stated; no approval tiers, rollback or scope limit. swimlane.com, read
17 : 18actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Cyware | Swimlane (Turbine) |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 5 of 6 | 5 of 6 |
| Identity | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 2 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 1 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| All five | 17 of 25 | 18 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Cyware, no published figure; Swimlane (Turbine), under 5 minutes (customer claim, grade C).
4buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Cyware has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it documents mobile approvals and playbook audit trails, with no action rollback. Swimlane mentions human-in-the-loop review and auditable actions without detail.
- lean team
- Neither is easier to size up before a call. Cyware scopes cost per engagement and publishes no price; Swimlane publishes no price and sells tiered enterprise and MSSP options through sales.
- MSSP
- Only Swimlane states anything for MSSPs: it offers tiered MSSP options through sales. Cyware states no MSSP terms on the pages read.
- Microsoft estate
- Only Cyware says anything specific: it has a Microsoft partnership, announced 2025-10-22, under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence. Swimlane states no Microsoft-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when connector count and breadth matter most, because it states 400+ tool integrations and names categories rather than products.
Pick Swimlane when detection and response should arrive in one product, because it says customer detection logic and alerts from SIEM, EDR and cloud tools flow into the same routing model, so a SIEM is not stated as required.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Cyware alternatives and Swimlane (Turbine) alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.