Cyware vs D3 Security
Cyware is a low-code automation product, Orchestrate, sold beside a threat intelligence platform. D3 Security is an AI SOC platform that keeps a deterministic playbook engine beside four autonomy modes. They split on what a reviewer can read after an action, where the rubric reads Cyware as partial and D3 Security as documented on the pages read on 2026-11-03.
0.97points apart
The difference that decides it
On what a reviewer can read after an action, Cyware states complete audit trails for playbook changes without describing record contents, while D3 Security describes an immutable, timestamped audit record attributed at the command level, with regulator-ready exports (vendor claim). d3security.com, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Cyware | D3 Security | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (17 and 19 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.1 | 7.7 | -0.6 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 4.0 | level |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 8.0 | -1.5 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 6.0 | 8.5 | -2.5 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.0 | 8.5 | -0.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 6.0 | +0.5 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 3.5 | -0.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 6.0 | 9.0 | -3.0 |
| Total | 100 | 6.11 | 7.08 | 0.97 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Cyware and D3 Security.
6.5 : 8.0approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Cyware. Page states approvals through a mobile app for "critical automation decisions" and rollback of workflows to previous versions; action rollback and scope limits are not stated. cyware.com, read
D3 Security. Page states "Built-in approval gates at every command-risk tier" and configurable gates for autonomous modes; rollback and blast-radius controls are not stated. d3security.com, read
17 : 19actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Cyware | D3 Security |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 5 of 6 | 6 of 6 |
| Identity | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 1 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| All five | 17 of 25 | 19 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Cyware, no published figure; D3 Security, 4 to 8 minutes (vendor claim, grade C).
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- D3 Security has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it documents approval gates at every risk tier and an immutable audit record. Cyware documents mobile approvals and playbook audit trails, with no action rollback.
- lean team
- Neither is easier to size up before a call. Cyware scopes cost per engagement and publishes no price; D3 Security prices by alert volume tier, shows no amounts, and lists SIEM, EDR and XDR integrations.
- MSSP
- Only D3 Security states anything for MSSPs: it reports cutting 145,000 alerts to 200 for human review at one unnamed MSSP customer (vendor claim). Cyware states no MSSP terms on the pages read.
- Microsoft estate
- Both name Microsoft pieces. Cyware has a Microsoft partnership, announced 2025-10-22, under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence; D3 Security names Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender among its connectors.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only D3 Security says anything specific: it names CrowdStrike among its connectors. Cyware states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when detection and response should arrive in one product, because it starts playbooks from SIEM alerts, threat intelligence feeds or other events, with the ingestion mechanics not detailed.
Pick D3 Security when the record a reviewer reads after an action decides the purchase, because it describes an immutable, timestamped audit record attributed at the command level, with regulator-ready exports (vendor claim).
Read dates are on each source link. See also Cyware alternatives and D3 Security alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.