D3 Security alternatives
D3 Security ranks 1st of 14 at 7.08 on the published rubric. These are the gaps found on its own pages, read 2026-11-03, and the platforms that answer each, in rubric order. A gap is a finding about public material, not a claim that a capability is missing.
3gaps found
Where D3 Security is thin
A buyer cannot find an amount: the pricing page describes a structure by daily alert volume tier and a per-user licence, gives no figures, and lists no Morpheus trial. d3security.com, read
- With no SIEM in place, the platform page does not say whether Morpheus can take detections straight from EDR and identity tools. d3security.com, read
- Approval gates are published, but nothing on undoing a bad isolation or disablement, so rollback has to be tested in a pilot, not read in advance. d3security.com, read
The full scoring of D3 Security is on its profile.
5platforms
Alternatives to D3 Security, in rubric order
- Microsoft Sentinel, total 5.14, 9 of 25 actions. Answers the pricing gap: it publishes prices with units, from pay-as-you-go to commitment tiers. D3 Security against Microsoft Sentinel.
- Google Security Operations, total 6.09, 19 of 25 actions. Answers the detection coupling gap: it holds detection and response in one product. D3 Security against Google Security Operations.
- Swimlane (Turbine), total 5.84, 18 of 25 actions. Answers the detection coupling gap: it says customer detection alerts flow into the same routing as SIEM, EDR and cloud alerts (vendor claim). D3 Security against Swimlane (Turbine).
- Cyware, total 6.11, 17 of 25 actions. Answers the approval and rollback gap: it offers mobile approval of critical automation decisions and workflow version rollback (vendor claim). D3 Security against Cyware.
- Tines, total 5.62, 22 of 25 actions. Answers the pricing gap: it publishes a free edition with stated limits. D3 Security against Tines.
Order of the list follows the rubric total. Each platform's profile gives the source and read date for the facts behind its reason. For another weighting, see the buyer-type rankings.