Cyware vs Microsoft Sentinel
Cyware is a low-code automation product, Orchestrate, sold beside a threat intelligence platform. Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud SIEM whose automation rules call Azure Logic Apps playbooks. They split on price disclosure, where the rubric reads Cyware as not documented and Microsoft Sentinel as partial on the pages read on 2026-11-03. Check that difference first, then the buyer verdicts below.
0.97points apart
The difference that decides it
On price disclosure, Cyware publishes no price and scopes cost per engagement. Microsoft Sentinel publishes pay-as-you-go and commitment tiers from 100 GB to 50,000 GB a day, with playbooks billed separately as Logic Apps. microsoft.com, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Cyware | Microsoft Sentinel | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (17 and 9 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.1 | 4.7 | +2.4 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 3.5 | +0.5 |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 5.5 | +1.0 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 6.0 | 6.0 | level |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.0 | 6.5 | +1.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 8.0 | -1.5 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 3.5 | -0.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 6.0 | 3.5 | +2.5 |
| Total | 100 | 6.11 | 5.14 | 0.97 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Cyware and Microsoft Sentinel.
6.5 : 5.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Cyware. Page states approvals through a mobile app for "critical automation decisions" and rollback of workflows to previous versions; action rollback and scope limits are not stated. cyware.com, read
Microsoft Sentinel. Docs describe a service account with explicit resource-group permissions (Owner needed to grant), rule order and expiry dates, but no approval gate or rollback for actions inside playbooks. learn.microsoft.com, read
17 : 9actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Cyware | Microsoft Sentinel |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 5 of 6 | 3 of 6 |
| Identity | 5 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 1 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| All five | 17 of 25 | 9 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Cyware, no published figure; Microsoft Sentinel, no published figure.
4buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Neither separates itself on published approval and audit detail. Cyware documents mobile approvals and playbook audit trails, with no action rollback; Microsoft Sentinel documents permissions and rule expiry but no approval gate or per-action record. Ask both for the control documentation in writing.
- lean team
- Microsoft Sentinel is easier to size up before a call: it publishes pay-as-you-go and commitment pricing, with playbook runs billed separately. Cyware scopes cost per engagement and publishes no price.
- MSSP
- Neither Cyware nor Microsoft Sentinel states MSSP terms on the pages read. Ask both for multitenant approval settings and per-client audit exports.
- Microsoft estate
- Both name Microsoft pieces. Cyware has a Microsoft partnership, announced 2025-10-22, under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence; Microsoft Sentinel is the Microsoft SIEM itself and takes Defender XDR incidents as triggers.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when deployment location and data handling are fixed by policy, because it describes hybrid deployment through lightweight agents and shows a SOC 2 Type 2 logo, without residency or retention.
Pick Microsoft Sentinel when you need to see a price or a pricing unit before a sales call, because it publishes pay-as-you-go and commitment tiers from 100 GB to 50,000 GB a day, with playbooks billed separately as Logic Apps.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Cyware alternatives and Microsoft Sentinel alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.