Cyware vs Prophet Security
Cyware is a low-code automation product, Orchestrate, sold beside a threat intelligence platform. Prophet Security describes itself as an agentic SOC platform sold with a 24x7 service, Watchtower. They split on published time-to-contain evidence, where the rubric reads Cyware as not documented and Prophet Security as partial on the pages read on 2026-11-03.
1.24points apart
The difference that decides it
On published time-to-contain evidence, Cyware gives no containment time, and its 80 percent cut in manual tasks (vendor claim) has no method, while Prophet Security claims validated escalations in under 30 minutes for Watchtower, a vendor claim with no method and not a containment time. prophetsecurity.ai, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Cyware | Prophet Security | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (17 and 0 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.1 | 2.0 | +5.1 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 5.0 | -1.0 |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 6.5 | level |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 6.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | level |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | level |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 6.0 | 7.0 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100 | 6.11 | 4.87 | 1.24 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Cyware and Prophet Security.
6.5 : 6.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Cyware. Page states approvals through a mobile app for "critical automation decisions" and rollback of workflows to previous versions; action rollback and scope limits are not stated. cyware.com, read
Prophet Security. Page says it "Responds through scoped Agent Actions, autonomously or with your sign-off"; tiers, rollback and scope limits are not stated. prophetsecurity.ai, read
17 : 0actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Cyware | Prophet Security |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 5 of 6 | 0 of 6 |
| Identity | 5 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 0 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| All five | 17 of 25 | 0 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Cyware, no published figure; Prophet Security, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Neither separates itself on published approval and audit detail. Cyware documents mobile approvals and playbook audit trails, with no action rollback; Prophet Security previews remediation and takes only approved actions, but describes no audit record. Ask both for the control documentation in writing.
- lean team
- Neither is easier to size up before a call. Cyware scopes cost per engagement and publishes no price; Prophet Security offers a free proof of value but publishes no price.
- MSSP
- Neither Cyware nor Prophet Security states MSSP terms on the pages read. Ask both for multitenant approval settings and per-client audit exports.
- Microsoft estate
- Both name Microsoft pieces. Cyware has a Microsoft partnership, announced 2025-10-22, under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence; Prophet Security names Microsoft Sentinel and Entra ID among its integrations.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only Prophet Security says anything specific: it names CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM among its integrations. Cyware states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when connector count and breadth matter most, because it states 400+ tool integrations and names categories rather than products.
Pick Prophet Security when deployment location and data handling are fixed by policy, because it states dedicated single-tenant deployment with a bring-your-own-key option, without regions or retention.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Cyware alternatives and Prophet Security alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.