Cyware vs Tines
Cyware is a low-code automation product, Orchestrate, sold beside a threat intelligence platform. Tines is a no-code workflow platform with a Cases add-on and an AI SOC page. They split on approval, rollback and blast radius, where the rubric reads Cyware as partial and Tines as not documented on the pages read on 2026-11-03.
0.49points apart
The difference that decides it
On approval, rollback and blast radius, Tines says agents allow autonomous workflow activity and states no approval step, rollback or scope limit; Cyware states approvals through a mobile app for critical automation decisions and rollback of workflows to earlier versions, with no action rollback or scope limits. cyware.com, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Cyware | Tines | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (17 and 22 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.1 | 8.6 | -1.5 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 3.5 | +3.0 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.0 | 6.5 | +1.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | level |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 5.5 | -2.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 6.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 |
| Total | 100 | 6.11 | 5.62 | 0.49 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Cyware and Tines.
6.5 : 3.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Cyware. Page states approvals through a mobile app for "critical automation decisions" and rollback of workflows to previous versions; action rollback and scope limits are not stated. cyware.com, read
Tines. The product page says Agents enable "autonomous workflow activity and user interaction" but states no approval step, rollback or scope limit. tines.com, read
17 : 22actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Cyware | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 5 of 6 | 6 of 6 |
| Identity | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 1 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| All five | 17 of 25 | 22 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Cyware, no published figure; Tines, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Cyware has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it documents mobile approvals and playbook audit trails, with no action rollback. Tines states neither an approval step nor an audit log on the pages read.
- lean team
- Tines is easier to size up before a call: it publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows. Cyware scopes cost per engagement and publishes no price.
- MSSP
- Neither Cyware nor Tines states MSSP terms on the pages read. Ask both for multitenant approval settings and per-client audit exports.
- Microsoft estate
- Both name Microsoft pieces. Cyware has a Microsoft partnership, announced 2025-10-22, under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence; Tines lists Microsoft and Microsoft Teams in its story library.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only Tines says anything specific: it lists CrowdStrike in its story library. Cyware states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when approval controls must be readable in the docs, because it states approvals through a mobile app for critical automation decisions and rollback of workflows to earlier versions, with no action rollback or scope limits.
Pick Tines when detection and response should arrive in one product, because it accepts automated webhook notifications and does not mention a SIEM.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Cyware alternatives and Tines alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.