Tines alternatives
Tines ranks 8th of 14 at 5.62 on the published rubric. These are the gaps found on its own pages, read 2026-11-03, and the platforms that answer each, in rubric order. A gap is a finding about public material, not a claim that a capability is missing.
3gaps found
Where Tines is thin
No MTTR, MTTD, accuracy or closure figure appears on the home page, blog index, docs or pricing page read. tines.com, read
- Agents are described as acting autonomously, but no approval step, rollback or scope limit is stated. tines.com, read
- Cases are described as a collaborative workspace; no audit log or per-action record is stated. tines.com, read
The full scoring of Tines is on its profile.
5platforms
Alternatives to Tines, in rubric order
- D3 Security, total 7.08, 19 of 25 actions. Answers the approval and rollback gap: it publishes built-in approval gates at every command-risk tier (vendor claim). Tines against D3 Security.
- Google Security Operations, total 6.09, 19 of 25 actions. Answers the approval and rollback gap: it documents manual approval by default, risk thresholds from Low to High and per-action overrides, though the agent is Pre-GA. Tines against Google Security Operations.
- Torq, total 5.74, 13 of 25 actions. Answers the audit trail gap: it states that every verdict, decision, exception and override is captured (vendor claim). Tines against Torq.
- Mate Security, total 4.87, 0 of 25 actions. Answers the audit trail gap: it describes Decision Traces and an evidence trail the team can audit (vendor claim), without log format or retention. Tines against Mate Security.
- Cyware, total 6.11, 17 of 25 actions. Answers the approval and rollback gap: it offers mobile approval of critical automation decisions and workflow version rollback (vendor claim). Tines against Cyware.
Order of the list follows the rubric total. Each platform's profile gives the source and read date for the facts behind its reason. For another weighting, see the buyer-type rankings.