Cyware vs Mate Security
Cyware is a low-code automation product, Orchestrate, sold beside a threat intelligence platform. Mate Security describes itself as an agentic security operations platform. They split on integration depth, where the rubric reads Cyware as documented and Mate Security as partial on the pages read on 2026-11-03. Check that difference first, then the buyer verdicts below.
1.24points apart
The difference that decides it
On integration depth, Mate Security publishes no integration count or list and names tool categories only; Cyware states 400+ tool integrations and names categories rather than products. cyware.com, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Cyware | Mate Security | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (17 and 0 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.1 | 2.0 | +5.1 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 4.0 | level |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 7.6 | -1.1 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 6.0 | 7.0 | -1.0 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.0 | 5.5 | +2.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 5.0 | +1.5 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 5.5 | -2.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100 | 6.11 | 4.87 | 1.24 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Cyware and Mate Security.
6.5 : 7.6approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Cyware. Page states approvals through a mobile app for "critical automation decisions" and rollback of workflows to previous versions; action rollback and scope limits are not stated. cyware.com, read
Mate Security. Platform page names Recommend only, Supervised ("Risky changes still ask") and Auto-run, scores each action on confidence, precision and reversibility, and returns a category to Supervised on drift; there is no per-action doc, rollback mechanics or scope term on the pages read. mate.security, read
17 : 0actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Cyware | Mate Security |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 5 of 6 | 0 of 6 |
| Identity | 5 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 0 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| All five | 17 of 25 | 0 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Cyware, no published figure; Mate Security, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Mate Security has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it names three autonomy modes and Decision Traces, both vendor claims without export detail. Cyware documents mobile approvals and playbook audit trails, with no action rollback.
- lean team
- Neither is easier to size up before a call. Cyware scopes cost per engagement and publishes no price; Mate Security publishes no price and says it starts in shadow mode on real alerts.
- MSSP
- Only Mate Security states anything for MSSPs: it quotes Water-IT, an MSSP, on serving any stack from one platform (vendor claim). Cyware states no MSSP terms on the pages read.
- Microsoft estate
- Both name Microsoft pieces. Cyware has a Microsoft partnership, announced 2025-10-22, under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence; Mate Security names Microsoft Defender among its tool examples, without a connector list.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only Mate Security says anything specific: it names CrowdStrike among its tool examples and was selected for the 2026 CrowdStrike, AWS and NVIDIA startup accelerator (announced 2026-01-05). Cyware states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when connector count and breadth matter most, because it states 400+ tool integrations and names categories rather than products.
Pick Mate Security when approval controls must be readable in the docs, because it names three modes, Recommend only, Supervised and Auto-run, and scores each action on confidence, precision and reversibility (vendor claim), with no per-action documentation or rollback mechanics.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Cyware alternatives and Mate Security alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.