Time to Contain

Mate Security alternatives

Mate Security ranks 11th of 14 at 4.87 on the published rubric. These are the gaps found on its own pages, read 2026-11-03, and the platforms that answer each, in rubric order. A gap is a finding about public material, not a claim that a capability is missing.

3gaps found

Where Mate Security is thin

Mate publishes no integration count, no integrations page and no list of containment actions per tool, so its coverage cannot be checked in public. mate.security, read

  • Mate publishes no containment time and no method for its 98.7 percent, 97 percent and 6.1x figures, which are vendor claims about investigation. mate.security, read
  • Mate publishes no price; the route is a demo or an AWS Marketplace private offer, and no list price was read. mate.security, read

The full scoring of Mate Security is on its profile.

5platforms

Alternatives to Mate Security, in rubric order

  1. Splunk SOAR (Cisco), total 5.79, 19 of 25 actions. Answers the integration depth gap: it states 2,800+ actions across 300+ third-party tools (vendor claim). Mate Security against Splunk SOAR (Cisco).
  2. D3 Security, total 7.08, 19 of 25 actions. Answers the integration depth gap: it states 800+ connectors and names many of them (vendor claim). Mate Security against D3 Security.
  3. Swimlane (Turbine), total 5.84, 18 of 25 actions. Answers the time-to-contain evidence gap: it quotes a customer containing threats in under 5 minutes, with no method (customer claim). Mate Security against Swimlane (Turbine).
  4. Microsoft Sentinel, total 5.14, 9 of 25 actions. Answers the pricing gap: it publishes prices with units, from pay-as-you-go to commitment tiers. Mate Security against Microsoft Sentinel.
  5. Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, total 5.91, 20 of 25 actions. Answers the integration depth gap: it states 900+ integration and automation packs (vendor claim). Mate Security against Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR.

Order of the list follows the rubric total. Each platform's profile gives the source and read date for the facts behind its reason. For another weighting, see the buyer-type rankings.