D3 Security vs Torq
D3 Security is an AI SOC platform that keeps a deterministic playbook engine beside four autonomy modes. Torq is an AI SOC platform with hyperautomation, case management and agent products. They split on deployment and data handling, where the rubric reads D3 Security as documented and Torq as not documented on the pages read on 2026-11-03.
1.34points apart
The difference that decides it
On deployment and data handling, D3 Security states Azure cloud with residency in the United States, Canada, Ireland or Japan, plus an isolated on-premises option. Torq does not state deployment options on the page read. d3security.com, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | D3 Security | Torq | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (19 and 13 of 25 actions) | 25 | 7.7 | 5.9 | +1.8 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 4.0 | level |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 8.0 | 6.5 | +1.5 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 8.5 | 8.0 | +0.5 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 8.5 | 7.0 | +1.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.5 | 3.0 | +0.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 9.0 | 3.5 | +5.5 |
| Total | 100 | 7.08 | 5.74 | 1.34 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of D3 Security and Torq.
8.0 : 6.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
D3 Security. Page states "Built-in approval gates at every command-risk tier" and configurable gates for autonomous modes; rollback and blast-radius controls are not stated. d3security.com, read
Torq. Page says response runs fully autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight and cites a manual override; no tiers, rollback or scope limit. torq.io, read
19 : 13actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | D3 Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 6 of 6 | 4 of 6 |
| Identity | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| 3 of 5 | 1 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Network | 3 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| All five | 19 of 25 | 13 of 25 |
Published time to contain: D3 Security, 4 to 8 minutes (vendor claim, grade C); Torq, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- D3 Security has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it documents approval gates at every risk tier and an immutable audit record. Torq documents audit logs and human-on-the-loop oversight, with no tiers or rollback.
- lean team
- D3 Security is easier to size up before a call: it prices by alert volume tier, shows no amounts, and lists SIEM, EDR and XDR integrations. Torq publishes no price and states no deployment options.
- MSSP
- Both state something for MSSPs. D3 Security reports cutting 145,000 alerts to 200 for human review at one unnamed MSSP customer (vendor claim); Torq cites RSM, a global MSSP, automating 82 percent of its cases (customer claim). Ask each for per-client approval settings and a tenant-level audit export.
- Microsoft estate
- Only D3 Security says anything specific: it names Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender among its connectors. Torq states no Microsoft-specific detail on the pages read.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only D3 Security says anything specific: it names CrowdStrike among its connectors. Torq states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick D3 Security when deployment location and data handling are fixed by policy, because it states Azure cloud with residency in the United States, Canada, Ireland or Japan, plus an isolated on-premises option.
Pick Torq when the record a reviewer reads after an action decides the purchase, because it says every verdict, decision, exception and override is captured with context, though the page states this for triage.
Read dates are on each source link. See also D3 Security alternatives and Torq alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.