Prophet Security vs Tines
Prophet Security describes itself as an agentic SOC platform sold with a 24x7 service, Watchtower. Tines is a no-code workflow platform with a Cases add-on and an AI SOC page. They split on approval, rollback and blast radius, where the rubric reads Prophet Security as partial and Tines as not documented on the pages read on 2026-11-03.
0.74points apart
The difference that decides it
On approval, rollback and blast radius, Prophet Security says agents take only actions the customer has approved and preview remediation before it runs, but states no tiers, rollback or scope limits. Tines says agents allow autonomous workflow activity and states no approval step, rollback or scope limit. prophetsecurity.ai, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Prophet Security | Tines | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (0 and 22 of 25 actions) | 25 | 2.0 | 8.6 | -6.6 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 3.5 | +3.0 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 5.5 | 5.0 | +0.5 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 7.0 | 6.5 | +0.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 6.5 | level |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 5.5 | -2.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 7.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 |
| Total | 100 | 4.87 | 5.62 | 0.74 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Prophet Security and Tines.
6.5 : 3.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Prophet Security. Page says it "Responds through scoped Agent Actions, autonomously or with your sign-off"; tiers, rollback and scope limits are not stated. prophetsecurity.ai, read
Tines. The product page says Agents enable "autonomous workflow activity and user interaction" but states no approval step, rollback or scope limit. tines.com, read
0 : 22actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Prophet Security | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 0 of 6 | 6 of 6 |
| Identity | 0 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| 0 of 5 | 4 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 0 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Network | 0 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| All five | 0 of 25 | 22 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Prophet Security, no published figure; Tines, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Prophet Security has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it previews remediation and takes only approved actions, but describes no audit record. Tines states neither an approval step nor an audit log on the pages read.
- lean team
- Tines is easier to size up before a call: it publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows. Prophet Security offers a free proof of value but publishes no price.
- MSSP
- Neither Prophet Security nor Tines states MSSP terms on the pages read. Ask both for multitenant approval settings and per-client audit exports.
- Microsoft estate
- Both name Microsoft pieces. Prophet Security names Microsoft Sentinel and Entra ID among its integrations; Tines lists Microsoft and Microsoft Teams in its story library.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Both name CrowdStrike pieces. Prophet Security names CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM among its integrations; Tines lists CrowdStrike in its story library.
When to pick each
Pick Prophet Security when approval controls must be readable in the docs, because it says agents take only actions the customer has approved and preview remediation before it runs, but states no tiers, rollback or scope limits.
Pick Tines when detection and response should arrive in one product, because it accepts automated webhook notifications and does not mention a SIEM.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Prophet Security alternatives and Tines alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.