Prophet Security vs Torq
Prophet Security describes itself as an agentic SOC platform sold with a 24x7 service, Watchtower. Torq is an AI SOC platform with hyperautomation, case management and agent products. They split on what a reviewer can read after an action, where the rubric reads Prophet Security as partial and Torq as documented on the pages read on 2026-11-03.
0.87points apart
The difference that decides it
On what a reviewer can read after an action, Torq says every verdict, decision, exception and override is captured with context, though the page states this for triage; Prophet Security says determinations can be audited, without describing record contents or export. torq.io, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Prophet Security | Torq | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (0 and 13 of 25 actions) | 25 | 2.0 | 5.9 | -3.9 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 6.5 | 6.5 | level |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 5.5 | 8.0 | -2.5 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 7.0 | 7.0 | level |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 6.5 | 5.0 | +1.5 |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | level |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 7.0 | 3.5 | +3.5 |
| Total | 100 | 4.87 | 5.74 | 0.87 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Prophet Security and Torq.
6.5 : 6.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Prophet Security. Page says it "Responds through scoped Agent Actions, autonomously or with your sign-off"; tiers, rollback and scope limits are not stated. prophetsecurity.ai, read
Torq. Page says response runs fully autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight and cites a manual override; no tiers, rollback or scope limit. torq.io, read
0 : 13actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Prophet Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 0 of 6 | 4 of 6 |
| Identity | 0 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 0 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Network | 0 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| All five | 0 of 25 | 13 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Prophet Security, no published figure; Torq, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Torq has the stronger published case on approval and audit: it documents audit logs and human-on-the-loop oversight, with no tiers or rollback. Prophet Security previews remediation and takes only approved actions, but describes no audit record.
- lean team
- Prophet Security is easier to size up before a call: it offers a free proof of value but publishes no price. Torq publishes no price and states no deployment options.
- MSSP
- Only Torq states anything for MSSPs: it cites RSM, a global MSSP, automating 82 percent of its cases (customer claim). Prophet Security states no MSSP terms on the pages read.
- Microsoft estate
- Only Prophet Security says anything specific: it names Microsoft Sentinel and Entra ID among its integrations. Torq states no Microsoft-specific detail on the pages read.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only Prophet Security says anything specific: it names CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM among its integrations. Torq states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Prophet Security when deployment location and data handling are fixed by policy, because it states dedicated single-tenant deployment with a bring-your-own-key option, without regions or retention.
Pick Torq when the record a reviewer reads after an action decides the purchase, because it says every verdict, decision, exception and override is captured with context, though the page states this for triage.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Prophet Security alternatives and Torq alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.