Mate Security vs Torq
Mate Security describes itself as an agentic security operations platform. Torq is an AI SOC platform with hyperautomation, case management and agent products. They split on integration depth, where the rubric reads both as partial on the pages read on 2026-11-03. Check that difference first, then the buyer verdicts below.
0.87points apart
The difference that decides it
On integration depth, Torq lists many named integrations on its integrations page but gives no count on the page read; Mate Security publishes no integration count or list and names tool categories only. torq.io, read
8criteria
Rubric side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Mate Security | Torq | Gap, first minus second |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native containment coverage (0 and 13 of 25 actions) | 25 | 2.0 | 5.9 | -3.9 |
| Published time-to-contain evidence with method | 15 | 4.0 | 4.0 | level |
| Approval, rollback and blast-radius controls documented | 15 | 7.6 | 6.5 | +1.1 |
| Explanation and audit trail | 15 | 7.0 | 8.0 | -1.0 |
| Integration depth documented | 10 | 5.5 | 7.0 | -1.5 |
| Detection-to-response coupling | 8 | 5.0 | 5.0 | level |
| Pricing transparency | 6 | 5.5 | 3.0 | +2.5 |
| Deployment and data handling | 6 | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| Total | 100 | 4.87 | 5.74 | 0.87 |
Full reasons and sources for every score are on the profiles of Mate Security and Torq.
7.6 : 6.5approval score each
Approval and rollback controls
Mate Security. Platform page names Recommend only, Supervised ("Risky changes still ask") and Auto-run, scores each action on confidence, precision and reversibility, and returns a category to Supervised on drift; there is no per-action doc, rollback mechanics or scope term on the pages read. mate.security, read
Torq. Page says response runs fully autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight and cites a manual override; no tiers, rollback or scope limit. torq.io, read
0 : 13actions of 25
Containment coverage by domain
| Domain | Mate Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| EDR | 0 of 6 | 4 of 6 |
| Identity | 0 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | |
| Cloud | 0 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Network | 0 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| All five | 0 of 25 | 13 of 25 |
Published time to contain: Mate Security, no published figure; Torq, no published figure.
5buyer types
Verdict by buyer type
- regulated financial
- Neither separates itself on published approval and audit detail. Mate Security names three autonomy modes and Decision Traces, both vendor claims without export detail; Torq documents audit logs and human-on-the-loop oversight, with no tiers or rollback. Ask both for the control documentation in writing.
- lean team
- Mate Security is easier to size up before a call: it publishes no price and says it starts in shadow mode on real alerts. Torq publishes no price and states no deployment options.
- MSSP
- Both state something for MSSPs. Mate Security quotes Water-IT, an MSSP, on serving any stack from one platform (vendor claim); Torq cites RSM, a global MSSP, automating 82 percent of its cases (customer claim). Ask each for per-client approval settings and a tenant-level audit export.
- Microsoft estate
- Only Mate Security says anything specific: it names Microsoft Defender among its tool examples, without a connector list. Torq states no Microsoft-specific detail on the pages read.
- CrowdStrike estate
- Only Mate Security says anything specific: it names CrowdStrike among its tool examples and was selected for the 2026 CrowdStrike, AWS and NVIDIA startup accelerator (announced 2026-01-05). Torq states no CrowdStrike-specific detail on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Mate Security when approval controls must be readable in the docs, because it names three modes, Recommend only, Supervised and Auto-run, and scores each action on confidence, precision and reversibility (vendor claim), with no per-action documentation or rollback mechanics.
Pick Torq when connector count and breadth matter most, because it lists many named integrations on its integrations page but gives no count on the page read.
Read dates are on each source link. See also Mate Security alternatives and Torq alternatives, or the buyer-type rankings.